Taking the Scenic Route

Monday October 17, 2005

17th October 2005

Monday October 17, 2005

Happy.  Proud.  Relieved. 

Today was SUCH a good day.  The last 2 days or so it is like I have a different child.  He has occasionally shown gains with his verbal skills, but nothing like the last few days.  Tonight, instead of the typical bedtime stories (Say Cheese and Harold and the Purple Crayon being his biggest repeats), he wanted his picture books ( Little Word Book, Baby Words) and not only named pretty much everything in the books, but was able to follow instructions like “point to the blue things” over and over again, with different questions.  He also knew shapes (even some less typical ones) that we have gone over, but were never sure if he understood.  He also got really excited when the pictures of the Elephants & Chimpanzees came up and became very animated.  (we saw those today). 

Tonight when we went to the playground, he ’showed’ Justin how to climb up the equipment and go down the slide.  He also did a spectacular job of waiting for Justin to go down the slide with no prompting from us.  Yesterday Justin had come over for 20-30 minutes while Ann ran to Wal-mart to pick up some groceries and Zane had played so nicely it amazed me.  He would give Justin toys, and show him how to play with different things.  It was nice seeing the trend continue.  Cody and Zane are the same age difference (Zane being the younger in that pairing) and it was always a total disaster when we got the two together.  Cody was always pushing and screaming at Zane and I sort of assumed that it was just the age.  I still think that is true to a degree, but it is nice that Zane doesn’t seem to be doing that.  He does occasionally take a toy from Justin, but it isn’t a regular thing and he returns it when prompted to.  Kindness is very important to me, so I am very glad to see that he is at least capable of it.  I don’t expect it to always be that way, after all, he is just a kid, but at least I know it isn’t a total fantasy. 

One funny thing was when we were leaving, Justin tripped on the grass.  Zane saw him fall and fell down next to him and waited until Justin got up to get up himself.  He looked at Justin like he was worried about him…very cute.  He is also seeming to grasp the concept of pumping his legs to get the swing going, and didn’t need help getting in the swing tonight (although we made sure he was sitting back far enough before pushing him).  He isn’t quite ready to swing unassisted yet, but he is starting to make the connections on how to move on a swing. 

Also tonight, he was talking and we were only half paying attention.  After a bit, we realized he was listing something, but it wasn’t readily apparent what he was saying.  All of a sudden, Zach started understanding what he was saying….he was counting in Spanish….26, 27, 28….  To confirm that is what he was doing, he played the old game with him….In Spanish, Zach said 1, Zane said 2, Zach said 3, and on through the 20s.  He knows how to count at least to 29 in Spanish.  I don’t know how to count to 29 in Spanish.  The only thing we could think of was the Dora the Explorer computer game…there is a section that counts all the stars you gather in either English or Spanish.  It was pretty cool!

It is absolutely mind blowing how fast he is gaining words.  Today I heard probably around 50 words come out of his mouth that I have NEVER heard before.  That is really a low estimate too.  It was a much higher number if you take into account that he said most of what he did without hearing it immediately before and parroting it.  Totally blew me away.  I am in shock.

posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

17th October 2005

Monday October 17, 2005

“Start Game”

edited to add:  I guess I should point out what is funny.  Instead of putting his name in one of the spaces (1,2,3,4 area), he copied the “start” and “game” from the other part of the screen.

posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

16th October 2005

Sunday October 16, 2005

Aquaduct vbmenu_register(“postmenu_3947815″, true);
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 688
The above is good, but not so accurate in places, and lacking a little detail.

Here is what I think are the 10 most basic reasons;

1.There has never been a large scale scientific trial that has compared the short-term and long-term health of babies and children who were given all recommended vaccines, as opposed to babies and children who were given none. Vaccinated children in theory are presumed to be healthier by health authorities, but they cannot possibly know for sure.

2. Virtually all pre-licensing trials of recommended vaccines did not follow up trial participants for longer than 3 to 4 weeks. That was the timescale for the UK trials in the late 80s that gave the go ahead to the MMR there. The biggest trial ever on the DPT only followed up for 48 hours! These time-frames cannot hope to find long-term side-effects.

3. Vaccines are commonly given in batches all at once. Yet there has never been an evaluation of synergistic effects in children given 6 or 7 various vaccines at once(ie. DPT, Hep. B, Polio, prevnar). Vaccines like for example hepatitis B or DPT are evaluated individually.

4. A utilitarian rationale is usually given by health authorities to justify the many side-effects of vaccination programmes: the benefits outweigh the risks. Apart from being based on defective evaluations of risks, this goes against the Nuremberg Code of medical ethics, adopted by the medical profession after WW2 in the light of Nazi doctor’s experiments, which held that the rights of the individual to refuse medical treatments, and not be coerced, are more important than the alleged rights of the collective. In short, the ends cannot justify the means.

5. Mortality records reveal that death-rates from vaccinable childhood illnesses had decreased an average of 90% in the 100 years prior to advent of mass immunisation prpgrammes in the late 1950s in western countries. Indeed, one of the most deadly diseases for children, Scarlet Fever, decreased the same as the rest, despite there never having been a mass-scale vaccine used for it. Better hygiene knowledge, increased standards of living, and evolving herd resistence can claim most of the credit.

6. Vaccines contain proteins that can putrefy, and therefore must often contain highly toxic preservatives like mercury compounds, antifreeze and formeldehyde. They also commonly contain aluminium, antibiotics, bovine fetal serum, msg, casein, and miscellaneous viral DNA from culture mediums like human embryonic tissues, monkey kidneys etc. Not only are the synergistic effects of compounding toxic substances with unknown foreign proteins, xenoviruses etc. unknown and unevaluated: there is absolutely no will on the part of manufacturers and endorsing health bodies to start doing these evaluations.

7.Vaccines can damage recipients, of that there is no doubt. The US government legislated in 1986 to indemnify vaccine manufacturers from being sued by parents of vaccine-damaged children. This set up a tax-payer funded compensation scheme which has to date paid out ? billion dollars, despite being very hard and unfair on claimants. In effect the citizenry pay out for both the vaccines and ensuing array of side-effects, allowing private companies to amass profits free of liability. This externalising of costs is great for Wall St. but not so great for individual families and society in general which must bear the burden of looking after damaged children.

8. The childhood illnesses are not generally dangerous to children who are well nourished and have normal immunity. Complications and deaths have been much exaggerated by health authorities in order to scare people into compliance. More holistic solutions to lessening disease rates in the vulnerable early years of infancy, and decreasing chances of complications, such as prolonged breastfeeding, use of vitamin and mineral supplementation, good nutrition etc. are not seriously looked at by health authorities because these solutions are not patentable, and therefore not profitable to the giant corporations of the Pharmaceutical industry who have enormous undemocratic influence over not just the medical profession and government departments, but the mass media.

9. Many studies exist showing strong links between vaccines and the inexorable rise of chronic illnesses amongst children and young adults in recent years. All vaccines are capable of provoking inflammation of the central nervous system (brain fevers), autoimmune dysfunctions, and general malaise. Prestigious medical journals, for example, have published studies showing a link between the MMR vaccine and autism, as well as chronic bowel diseases like Chrohns and ulceritive colitis. Similar studies have linked the hepatitis B shot with M.S, blindness, and juvenile diabetes, while the DPT is linked strongly with autism, SIDS, asthma, epilepsy, shock syndromes, cerebral palsey, and learning problems. The oral polio vaccine is an acknoledged cause of polio, and is known to carry the contaminent simian virus no. 40 which is a known carcinogen. It is impossible to keep it and other monkey viruses out of the vaccines since minced up monkey kidneys are the cultural medium for vaccine polio viruses.

10. Vaccines are a quick-fix technocentric profit-driven solution which teaches people to have faith in things outside of themselves. This is unrealistic because without our innate wonderfully flexible and innovative vital energies or immune-systems we could not hope to survive a day. Reductionist medical interventions like vaccines fail to account for the whole of what goes into good health: good nutrition, clean water, maturation of immunity by experience of acute illnesses, love, breastfeeding, freedom from hormone disrupting chemicals etc. In the end good health is the only true immunity.

I’m open to criticism and suggestions to improve the above. Perhps you think I have missed a major point? Can’t remember the sum that has been paid out thru VAERS. Can anyone help.


Last edited by Aquaduct : Today at 08:00 PM.

posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

16th October 2005

Sunday October 16, 2005

Great Day!  We went to the ZOO!

Orangutan against the glass

Watching the Apes.

 

He was very excited to see the elephant.  He had a look of amazement on his face as he kept exclaiming “Elephant!  Go inside (the fence) to see Elephant!”

 

 

The sheep were pretty aggressive.  In order to get the food out of the little container, you needed one person to block while the other retrieved the food.  Zach’s first try the sheep stuck his nose in and Zach ended up with 3 pebbles of food.  Farm girl went back in and blocked, forming a team with another mama trying to get some food.

 

“There’s a TURPLE!”

 

posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

16th October 2005

Sunday October 16, 2005

A rather interesting little tidbit I discovered about the new SIDs guidelines I talked about on my Oct. 11 blog post.  Let’s take a minute to see who sponsored the study, as stated on their website  Notice, all of these companies have a vested interest in promoting pacifiers and crib sleeping.

Among the top Corporate sponsors ($100K and above)

  • Halo, (makes crib mattresses, crib accessories, crib bedding & crib sleep sacks)
  • Gerber (makes pacifiers & crib bedding)
  • Ross (formula manufacturer, so no scruples about encouraging pacifier usage…interferes with breastfeeding). 

Other Corporate sponsors:

  • Walmart foundation
  • Babies R Us (sells cribs & pacifiers)
  • Baby Depot at Burlington Coat Factory (again, sells cribs & pacifiers)
  • Kiddopotamus & Co (sells sleep sacks for crib sleeping babies)
  • Tiny Love/The Maya Group (sells crib mobiles)



Dr. Sears speaks out

Dr. William Sears, MD (author of a large number of Parenting books), Speaks out against the new AAP policy of co-sleeping.

  • Back sleeping is the safest, and we agree
  • We don’t recommend breastfed babies use a pacifier
  • What the AAP continues to ignore, however, is the fact that virtually all of the 2500 cases of SIDS each year in the U.S. occur in cribs.
  • co-sleeping is much safer
  • Research around the U.S. has shown that about half of American families co-sleep with their babies. We should focus our efforts on teaching parents to do this safely instead of trying to get them to change their parenting instincts and use a crib.

 

posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

15th October 2005

Saturday October 15, 2005

Food Science for 3 year olds

Did you know that if you eat this cereal and hold it between your lips, you can blow and make a cascade of milk bubbles run down your chin?  Something to do with the physics of air pockets to milk ratio I guess. 

posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

15th October 2005

Saturday October 15, 2005

Bell peppers, my main craving this pregnancy, have gone back out of season.  They are now $1.78 per pepper.  YIKES!  They are already too expensive in season ($.50 /each).   I have always liked bell peppers, especially colored ones, but right now it is one of the only things that doesn’t leave me queasy.  I wonder how hard it would be to raise them in containers next summer.  It would be like planting gold around here.  They also freeze really well, so it would be something I could easily handle an over-abundance of. 

I think I am still fighting anemia.  I haven’t ever been diagnosed with it, but it seems like I will get super drained and feel just awful and Zach realizes that I probably need iron, gets me something high in iron (romaine lettuce with sour cream being my favorite…and no, not a weird pregnancy craving, although I have craved it with both this one and Zane.  It is how my paternal grandma and mom would fix garden leaf lettuce growing up.  Of course, if it wasn’t for me or my dad, they would also throw in chives).  Eggs in our cast iron pan has also been a big thing, especially when beef is too pricey (or sounds too greasy)

We have already had a busy day and it isn’t even half over.  Justin (neighbor’s 17mo) came over for a bit today.  I forget how much more work they are at that age.  Then again, other people’s kids are always a lot more work than your own.  We were going to go with them to Haysville for a Fall Fest, but decided against it.  We just don’t have enough money to go wonder around someplace where almost everything costs money (the main attractions are food and carnival rides).  So, we are going to clean for a while, then maybe go for a walk and/or the Y for some swimming.  It looks like the leaves are starting to turn.  If we can find some pretty ones, we will gather them and attempt to make a wreath for the door. 

posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

15th October 2005

Saturday October 15, 2005

Hi Mom & Dad!  Hope you guys are enjoying Colorado!

posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

14th October 2005

Friday October 14, 2005

October 11, 2005, 9:07 pm PDT

10/07 The Latest Debates

I am a bit late chiming in here, but the subject has been on my mind since the show aired. 

I am astonished that people think a bottle of formula is an appropriate substitute for nursing.  Why is an artificial breast fine, but the real one disgusting in some way?  It makes no sense at all.  Plus, there are a lot of babies who do not cope well with formula.  I really don’t think it is fair for my child to be miserable and constipated for a week or two because some narrow minded fool can’t act like a human being.   

I also laughed myself silly when I hear people talking about breastfeeding ‘discreetly’.  Have you ever been a parent?  Granted, some children will tolerate being under a blanket, but certainly not mine.  I did try for a while and realized how foolish it was.  In the first place, if I used a blanket it caused a huge amount of attention to what I was doing.  If I just nursed him, people would stand there and talk to me and my child, even touching his check and hair without realizing that I was nursing at all.  I find it terribly amusing that it is very likely a anti-NIP person probably oooh-ed and awe-ed over my child, not realizeing I was nursing at the time.  So, which sounds more discreet to you? 

Second, who wants to eat under a blanket?  (or in a bathroom)  Babies are people and have as much right to common decency as everybody else.  If we suggested that elderly people need to eat in the bathroom or under a blanket because they drool, people would be outraged.  How is a baby an less of a person? 

 I am ready to have my second child in January.  This time around, I will keep a blanket in my diaper bag.  If somebody asks me to cover up, I will happily place a blanket on their head so nobody has to look at their attitude. 

 


 
 
October 12, 2005, 10:11 am PDT

10/07 The Latest Debates

Quote From: xylemnik86

It is called a breast pump , a bodle and some planning. It is also about curtsy and respect for others. I find it totally disgusting to sit there and watch a mother whip it out in public and stick it into the kids mouth. YOU DIDN’T Whip it out before you had the kid now did you . I just bet you all are against porn too……. I am really sick to death how this country has a double standard for just about everything. If you don’t have children you are considered selfish. If you do everything has to be about them. Were is the balance. This country is to tilted to the right and the individuals rights are not even being respected. I also have a comment for the parents who love to take their kids to church and let them sit and scream during the service… Boy do I have a problem with you … I spend 1 hour a week at mass. I DO NOT Appreciate to have to put up with a screaming kid in back of me wile the priest is trying to read the Gospel. Why don’t you take the little darling in the quite room so the rest of us can enjoy the service and you can contain your children. The speakers in there will droned out the kids cry, too….

A breast pump has the same problems that bottle feeding does;  man can not reproduce what God (or nature, or however you attribute it) has designed so perfectly.  People can not make something that extracts the milk with the same efficency as a suckling child, and artificial human milk can not match real human milk, and an artificial nipple can not garner the same muscular response while sucking that feeding directly from the tap does.  They might be able to approxiamate it, but never truly reproduce it.  All of these things have their place, but I think that place is in emergency situations, not everyday life.  They are to help babies survive, but are not the best choice all other things being equal.   

Breast pumps available to the public never worked for me.  A breast pump at the hospital I was using post-surgery (emergency surgery at 5 weeks postpartum) was able to relieve the bulk of my engorgemnent, but certainly not close to being able to empty the breast. 

And, for the record, in the nearly 4 years I have been breastfeeding, I have never “whipped it out”.  That is a term used by people who are trying to be offensive.  I have never seen anybody nursing act in this way.     

In response to your issue with children during services:  If the parents were breastfeeding, they probably wouldn’t be screaming.  That is one way to keep a child quiet and put them to sleep.  So, you either need to get used to screaming, or get used to breastfeeding.  Jesus didn’t say to keep the kids quiet, he said to include them, so the insistence on segregating children is not something the Gospels would support. 

posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

13th October 2005

Thursday October 13, 2005

You know, the puking can stop any time now. 

posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

  • Zane's age

  • Zane is 22 years, 4 months, and 3 days old
  • Zora's age

  • Zora is 18 years, 4 months, and 7 days old
  • Random Quote

  • Scissors cuts Paper
    Paper covers Rock
    Rock crushes Lizard
    Lizard poisons Spock
    Spock smashes Scissors
    Scissors decapitates Lizard
    Lizard eats Paper
    Paper disproves Spock
    Spock vaporizes Rock
    Rock crushes Scissors
    — Sheldon, Big Bang Theory

  • Subscribe


 Log in