Taking the Scenic Route

Aquaduct vbmenu_register(“postmenu_3947815″, true);

The above is good, but not so accurate in places, and lacking a little detail.

Here is what I think are the 10 most basic reasons;

1.There has never been a large scale scientific trial that has compared the short-term and long-term health of babies and children who were given all recommended vaccines, as opposed to babies and children who were given none. Vaccinated children in theory are presumed to be healthier by health authorities, but they cannot possibly know for sure.

2. Virtually all pre-licensing trials of recommended vaccines did not follow up trial participants for longer than 3 to 4 weeks. That was the timescale for the UK trials in the late 80s that gave the go ahead to the MMR there. The biggest trial ever on the DPT only followed up for 48 hours! These time-frames cannot hope to find long-term side-effects.

3. Vaccines are commonly given in batches all at once. Yet there has never been an evaluation of synergistic effects in children given 6 or 7 various vaccines at once(ie. DPT, Hep. B, Polio, prevnar). Vaccines like for example hepatitis B or DPT are evaluated individually.

4. A utilitarian rationale is usually given by health authorities to justify the many side-effects of vaccination programmes: the benefits outweigh the risks. Apart from being based on defective evaluations of risks, this goes against the Nuremberg Code of medical ethics, adopted by the medical profession after WW2 in the light of Nazi doctor’s experiments, which held that the rights of the individual to refuse medical treatments, and not be coerced, are more important than the alleged rights of the collective. In short, the ends cannot justify the means.

5. Mortality records reveal that death-rates from vaccinable childhood illnesses had decreased an average of 90% in the 100 years prior to advent of mass immunisation prpgrammes in the late 1950s in western countries. Indeed, one of the most deadly diseases for children, Scarlet Fever, decreased the same as the rest, despite there never having been a mass-scale vaccine used for it. Better hygiene knowledge, increased standards of living, and evolving herd resistence can claim most of the credit.

6. Vaccines contain proteins that can putrefy, and therefore must often contain highly toxic preservatives like mercury compounds, antifreeze and formeldehyde. They also commonly contain aluminium, antibiotics, bovine fetal serum, msg, casein, and miscellaneous viral DNA from culture mediums like human embryonic tissues, monkey kidneys etc. Not only are the synergistic effects of compounding toxic substances with unknown foreign proteins, xenoviruses etc. unknown and unevaluated: there is absolutely no will on the part of manufacturers and endorsing health bodies to start doing these evaluations.

7.Vaccines can damage recipients, of that there is no doubt. The US government legislated in 1986 to indemnify vaccine manufacturers from being sued by parents of vaccine-damaged children. This set up a tax-payer funded compensation scheme which has to date paid out ? billion dollars, despite being very hard and unfair on claimants. In effect the citizenry pay out for both the vaccines and ensuing array of side-effects, allowing private companies to amass profits free of liability. This externalising of costs is great for Wall St. but not so great for individual families and society in general which must bear the burden of looking after damaged children.

8. The childhood illnesses are not generally dangerous to children who are well nourished and have normal immunity. Complications and deaths have been much exaggerated by health authorities in order to scare people into compliance. More holistic solutions to lessening disease rates in the vulnerable early years of infancy, and decreasing chances of complications, such as prolonged breastfeeding, use of vitamin and mineral supplementation, good nutrition etc. are not seriously looked at by health authorities because these solutions are not patentable, and therefore not profitable to the giant corporations of the Pharmaceutical industry who have enormous undemocratic influence over not just the medical profession and government departments, but the mass media.

9. Many studies exist showing strong links between vaccines and the inexorable rise of chronic illnesses amongst children and young adults in recent years. All vaccines are capable of provoking inflammation of the central nervous system (brain fevers), autoimmune dysfunctions, and general malaise. Prestigious medical journals, for example, have published studies showing a link between the MMR vaccine and autism, as well as chronic bowel diseases like Chrohns and ulceritive colitis. Similar studies have linked the hepatitis B shot with M.S, blindness, and juvenile diabetes, while the DPT is linked strongly with autism, SIDS, asthma, epilepsy, shock syndromes, cerebral palsey, and learning problems. The oral polio vaccine is an acknoledged cause of polio, and is known to carry the contaminent simian virus no. 40 which is a known carcinogen. It is impossible to keep it and other monkey viruses out of the vaccines since minced up monkey kidneys are the cultural medium for vaccine polio viruses.

10. Vaccines are a quick-fix technocentric profit-driven solution which teaches people to have faith in things outside of themselves. This is unrealistic because without our innate wonderfully flexible and innovative vital energies or immune-systems we could not hope to survive a day. Reductionist medical interventions like vaccines fail to account for the whole of what goes into good health: good nutrition, clean water, maturation of immunity by experience of acute illnesses, love, breastfeeding, freedom from hormone disrupting chemicals etc. In the end good health is the only true immunity.

I’m open to criticism and suggestions to improve the above. Perhps you think I have missed a major point? Can’t remember the sum that has been paid out thru VAERS. Can anyone help.